Why the study?
Novel hypertension phenotypes are described by cross-classification of brachial and aortic SBP, but their prevalence, age- and sex-distribution, modulating factors, and association with left ventricular hypertrophy required examination.
Does isolated aortic systolic hypertension increase the odds of left ventricular hypertrophy compared to concordant normotension?
Cross-Sectional (n=8,738)
Yes
Does isolated aortic systolic hypertension increase the odds of left ventricular hypertrophy compared to concordant normotension?
Isolated aortic systolic hypertension (IaoSH) is present in 7.7% of individuals and is significantly associated with higher odds of left ventricular hypertrophy compared to concordant normotension.
Isolated aortic systolic hypertension may refine LVH risk stratification in ambulatory monitoring; extends brachial BP phenotyping in hypertension research.
BACKGROUND: Novel hypertension phenotypes are described by cross-classification of brachial and aortic SBP (brSBP/aoSBP). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to examine their prevalence and age and sex-distribution, factors that potentially modulate them, and their association with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). METHODS: Data on 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) using the Mobilograph device (IEM GmbH, Stolberg, Germany) and LVH from the International 24-h Ambulatory aortic Blood pressure Consortium (i24ABC) were retrieved from 31 centers (17 countries). The population was categorized into four phenotypes; concordant systolic normotension (CSN: both SBPs normal), isolated brachial systolic hypertension (IbrSH: high brSBP/normal aoSBP), isolated aortic systolic hypertension (IaoSH: normal brSBP/high aoSBP), and concordant systolic hypertension (CSH: both SBPs high). RESULTS: In 8738 participants (age: 58.4 ± 15.1 years; 51.8% men), the prevalence of IaoSH was 7.7%, being more prevalent in men, and presenting a U-shape age-distribution in them compared to a linear distribution in females. IaoSH was associated with lower heart rate and beta-blockade medications. The prevalence of IbrSH was 6.5%, presenting an inverted U-shape age-distribution; it was higher in the presence of higher heart rate and calcium channel-blockade. In 2307 individuals with LVH data, after adjustment for age, sex, DBP, IaoSH - but not IbrSH - had 2.6 higher odds of LVH compared to CSN (95% confidence interval, 1.7-3.9) and similar to CSH. CONCLUSION: IaoSH and IbrSH amounted to almost 15% and showed specific clinic characteristics. Only IaoSH was significantly associated with LVH. Outcome-driven randomized controlled trials are needed to further investigate their clinical relevance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Athanasopoulou et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension (n=8,738). Isolated aortic systolic hypertension (IaoSH) vs. Concordant systolic normotension (CSN) was evaluated on Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.7-3.9).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: