Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This paper analyses discursive responses to the Letzte Generation/Ultima Generazione (LG/UG) protests in Germany and Italy. Despite the political differences in the two countries’ governing coalitions, both exhibit similarities in their response to civil disobedience-centred climate activism. We identify three discursive strategies that situate protesters outside the democratic sphere: disparaging, patronising, and criminalising. These strategies are utilised within larger narratives constructed around the activism of LG/UG: that these groups represent a threat to liberty, democracy and social cohesion. We see the antagonism between state and activist groups as rooted in competing understandings of democracy, and legitimate ways of effecting change.
Forte et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: