Key result
Home-based isometric handgrip training for 8 weeks significantly reduced systolic blood pressure compared to active control (MD -8.75 mmHg; 95% CI -10.39 to -6.51).
Why the study?
To confirm whether 8 weeks of home-based isometric handgrip training would reduce resting blood pressure in an adult Indian population.
Does 8 weeks of home-based isometric handgrip training reduce resting blood pressure and pulse rate in hypertensive adults aged 30-45 years?
RCT (n=40)
Double-blind
Stratified randomization
Does 8 weeks of home-based isometric handgrip training reduce resting blood pressure and pulse rate in hypertensive adults aged 30-45 years?
Mean Difference: -8.75 (95% CI -10.39–-6.51)
Home-based isometric handgrip training significantly reduces resting blood pressure and pulse rate in adults with early-stage hypertension.
Supports home-based isometric handgrip training to lower BP in early hypertension; extends RCT evidence for isometric exercise in this population.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to confirm whether 8 weeks of home-based isometric handgrip (IHG) training would reduce resting blood pressure (RBP) in an adult Indian population. METHODOLOGY: Hypertensive patients (Stage 1 [previously prehypertension] and Stage 2 [previously Stage 1 hypertension]) aged 30-45 years, male and female, were included. INTERVENTION: Two groups were included (active control group and IHG training group at 30% of maximal voluntary isometric contraction). Outcomes of this study were resting pulse rate (PR) and RBP, which were taken at baseline and after 8 weeks. Stratified randomization was done by sex and hypertension grade. The study was a double-blind intervention (both participants and the assessor were blinded to intervention allotment). RESULTS: Forty hypertensive individuals were randomly assigned to a control (N = 20) and an 8-week home-based IHG training (N = 20) using a stratified random sampling technique. Each training session consisted of 4 × 2 min bouts with a 4-min rest between bouts for 8 weeks. Resting PR and RBP were taken at baseline and after 8 weeks. After 8 weeks, there was a significant reduction in blood pressure and PR values in the IHG group as compared with those in the control group: systolic blood pressure (mean difference, MD -8.75 mmHg; 95% CI [-6.51, -10.39]); diastolic blood pressure (MD -8.35 mmHg; 95% CI [-6.25, -10.45]); mean arterial pressure (MD -8.13 mmHg; 95% CI [-6.21, -10.05]); and PR (MD -8.90 mmHg; 95% CI [-5.08, -12.72]. CONCLUSION: On the basis of study findings, home-based IHG training can be used as an adjunct to control BP in the initial stage of hypertension in an Indian population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Punia et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in Hypertension (n=40). Home-based isometric handgrip (IHG) training vs. Active control was evaluated on Systolic blood pressure (MD -8.75, 95% CI -10.39 to -6.51). Home-based isometric handgrip training for 8 weeks significantly reduced systolic blood pressure compared to active control (MD -8.75 mmHg; 95% CI -10.39 to -6.51).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: