Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study evaluates peri-implant diseases in patients with subcrestally placed implants, highlighting significant prevalence.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prevalence of peri-implant health, peri-implant mucositis or periimplantitis for subcrestally placed implants (1-3 mm) on the short-, medium- and long term. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two hundred patients were enrolled in this cross-sectional study that were treated and screened during regular maintenance visits at one university center. A total of 657 implants were evaluated. Peri-implant health and diseases were assessed according to predefined case definitions. Binary logistic regression was used to assess the correlation with local and systemic factors. RESULTS: After a median function time of 9.36 ± 6.44 years (range: 1-26 years), the prevalence of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis was 66.5% and 15.0%, at the patient level, corresponding to 62.6% and 7.5%, at the implant level, respectively. Peri-implantitis was significantly associated with patients' history of periodontitis (odds ratio, OR 5.33). CONCLUSION: Peri-implant diseases were a common finding around subcrestally placed implants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Obreja et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: