Key result
Poor detectability of the external elastic lamina by OFDI was significantly more frequent at the minimum lumen area site compared to non-MLA sites (86.1% vs 29.3%), with percent plaque area being the strongest predictor.
Why the study?
Detecting the external elastic lamina to assess vessel size is often challenging with light-based imaging due to light attenuation through atherosclerotic plaque.
Do coronary plaque characteristics assessed by IVUS predict the detectability of the external elastic lamina using OFDI?
Cross-Sectional (n=93)
Yes
Do coronary plaque characteristics assessed by IVUS predict the detectability of the external elastic lamina using OFDI?
Absolute Event Rate: 86.1% vs 29.3%
p-value: p=<0.05
Large plaque burden (%PA >60.3%), lipid pool, and calcification on IVUS significantly predict poor detectability of the external elastic lamina by OFDI, suggesting these areas should be avoided as stent landing zones.
Large IVUS plaque burden was associated with poor OFDI EEL detectability at MLA sites; leaves open optimal stent landing zone selection.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to examine associations between plaque characteristics by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and detectability of external elastic lamina (EEL) by optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI) in human coronary arteries. BACKGROUND: It is often challenging to detect EEL which represents vessel size by light-based imaging modalities due to light intensity attenuation through atherosclerotic plaque. METHODS: IVUS and OFDI prior to stent implantation were sequentially investigated per protocol. We identified corresponding cross-sections by minimum lumen area (MLA) or just distally to side branches as anatomical landmarks. Plaque characterization was determined by integrated backscatter IVUS analysis. We categorized detectable EEL arc by OFDI into four groups: 0≤ and <1 quadrant (group 1), 1≤ and <2 quadrants (group 2), 2≤ and <3 quadrants (group 3), or 3≤ and <4 quadrants (group 4). RESULTS: We prospectively studied 103 vessels in 93 patients with stable coronary artery disease. Corresponding 711 cross-sections were analyzed. Cross-sections with detectable EEL arc <2 quadrants (group 1 or 2) were observed in 86.1% of MLA sites but only in 29.3% of non-MLA sites (p < .05). Percentage plaque area (%PA) appeared to be the strongest predictor to detect EEL arc <2 quadrants with the cut-off of 60.3% (AUC 0.90; sensitivity 79.8%, specificity 85.5%). Lipid pool and calcification remained statistically significant in predicting detectable EEL arc <2 quadrants after adjustment with %PA. CONCLUSIONS: Presence of large plaque burden, lipid pool, and calcification significantly predicts the detectability of EEL by OFDI assessment. Locations with detectable EEL arc <2 quadrants should thus be avoided for optimal stent landing zone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ishikawa et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Stable angina (n=93). Minimum lumen area (MLA) site vs. Non-MLA site was evaluated on Poor detectability of external elastic lamina (<180 degrees) by optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI) (p=<0.05). Poor detectability of the external elastic lamina by OFDI was significantly more frequent at the minimum lumen area site compared to non-MLA sites (86.1% vs 29.3%), with percent plaque area being the strongest predictor.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: