PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 25, 2013Journal of Clinical Oncology151 citationsOpen Access

Deficits in Physical Function Among Young Childhood Cancer Survivors

MHMegan C. HoffmanDMDaniel A. MulrooneyJSJulia Steinberger

Key Result

Childhood cancer survivors of CNS tumors had significantly lower 6-minute walk test scores (533.3 vs 594.1 m; P<0.001) and timed up-and-go scores (5.1 vs 4.4 s; P<0.001) compared to siblings.

Study Design

Type

Cross-Sectional (n=330)

Structured PICO

Do childhood cancer survivors have lower physical performance scores compared to their siblings?

P
Population
330 participants including 183 childhood cancer survivors ≥ 5 years from diagnosis and 147 sibling controls age < 18 years, evaluated for physical performance.
C
Comparator
Sibling comparison group
O
Outcome
Physical performance measures including lower-extremity strength testing, timed up-and-go (TUG) test, and 6-minute walk (6MW) testsurrogate

Childhood cancer survivors exhibit significant deficits in physical function compared to siblings, which cannot be completely overcome by regular physical activity.

Abstract

PURPOSE: Childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) are at risk for physical disability. The aim of this investigation was to characterize and compare physical performance among CCSs and a group of siblings age < 18 years and determine if diagnosis, treatment, and physical activity levels were associated with lower performance scores. METHODS: CCSs ≥ 5 years from diagnosis and a sibling comparison group were recruited and evaluated for strength, mobility, and fitness. Physical performance measures were compared in regression models between survivors and siblings by diagnosis and among survivors by treatment exposures and physical activity levels. RESULTS: CCSs (n = 183; mean age ± standard deviation SD, 13.5 ± 2.5 years; 53% male) scored lower than siblings (n = 147; mean age ± SD, 13.4 ± 2.4 years; 50% male) on lower-extremity strength testing, the timed up-and-go (TUG) test, and the 6-minute walk (6MW) test, despite reporting similar levels and types of habitual physical activity. The lowest scores were prevalent among survivors of CNS tumors and bone and soft tissue sarcomas on strength testing (score ± SD: CNS tumors, 76.5 ± 4.7; sarcoma 67.1 ± 7.2 v siblings, 87.3 ± 2.4 Newton-meters quadricep strength at 90° per second; P = .04 and .01, respectively) and among CNS tumor survivors on the TUG (score ± SD: 5.1 ± 0.1 v siblings, 4.4 ± 0.1 seconds; P < .001) and 6MW tests (score ± SD: 533.3 ± 15.6 v siblings, 594.1 ± 8.3 m; P < .001). CONCLUSION: CCSs may have underlying physiologic deficits that interfere with function that cannot be completely overcome by participation in regular physical activity. These survivors may need referral for specialized exercise interventions in addition to usual counseling to remain physically active.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hoffman et al. (2013) conducted a cross-sectional in Childhood cancer (n=330). Childhood cancer survivorship vs. Siblings was evaluated on Physical performance measures (strength, mobility, and fitness). Childhood cancer survivors of CNS tumors had significantly lower 6-minute walk test scores (533.3 vs 594.1 m; P<0.001) and timed up-and-go scores (5.1 vs 4.4 s; P<0.001) compared to siblings.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a33014ec832e26dfd08bf7fhttps://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2012.47.8081
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper