Key result
This review presents the pathophysiological mechanisms of post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement complications and the rationale behind various antithrombotic regimens currently being evaluated.
Why the study?
The optimal antithrombotic regimen after successful transcatheter aortic valve replacement remains unclear in the absence of randomized trials, with concerns regarding bleeding and ischemic complications.
This review outlines the pathophysiological mechanisms of post-TAVR complications and the rationale for various antithrombotic regimens currently under investigation in randomized trials.
Does not support changing post-TAVR antithrombotic practice; leaves optimal regimens open for ongoing randomized trials.
The performance of transcatheter aortic valve replacement has expanded considerably during the past decade. Technological advances and refinement in implantation techniques have resulted in improved procedural outcomes, whereas indications are progressively extending toward lower-risk patients. Ischemic/embolic complications and major bleeding remain important and strongly correlate to mortality. In this regard, the optimal antithrombotic regimen after successful transcatheter aortic valve replacement remains unclear, in the absence of randomized trials. For patients without an indication for oral anticoagulation, empirical treatment with dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus clopidogrel) for 3 to 6 months is currently recommended. However, dual antiplatelet therapy has been preliminarily associated with increased risk of bleeding compared with single antiplatelet therapy without significant ischemic benefit. Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants and warfarin have also entered clinical investigation, to address the issue of preexisting or new-onset of atrial fibrillation and potentially attenuate subclinical leaflet thrombosis. Clinical trials are necessary to systematically address the risks and benefits of these approaches. In this review, we present the pathophysiological mechanisms of post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement complications and provide updated insights on the rationale behind the various antithrombotic regimens being currently evaluated in large randomized trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guedeney et al. (2019) conducted a review in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. Antithrombotic Therapy was evaluated. This review presents the pathophysiological mechanisms of post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement complications and the rationale behind various antithrombotic regimens currently being evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: