Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation was significantly attenuated in the morning at 8:00 (4.0%) compared to the afternoon at 17:00 (9.7%) (p<0.05).
Observational (n=13)
Does brachial artery flow-mediated dilation exhibit diurnal variation in healthy young men?
Endothelial function, as measured by flow-mediated dilation, exhibits significant diurnal variation and is attenuated in the morning, which may contribute to the morning peak of acute cardiovascular events.
Absolute Event Rate: 4% vs 9.7%
p-value: p=<0.05
Abstract Background and hypothesis : Brachial artery flow‐mediated dilation (FMD), a noninvasive, widely used clinical index of endothelial function and magnitude of FMD, has been reported to be closely related to many coronary risk factors and coronary atherosclerosis. However, there has been no study that examines the diurnal change of FMD. We designed this study to reveal the diurnal variation of FMD in healthy volunteers. Methods : We examined FMD in response to reactive hyperemia by high resolution ultrasound in 13 healthy young men (age 25–32) at four different times over the course of a day. Results : Mean measures of brachial artery FMD was 4.0% at 8:00, 5.3% at 12:00, 9.7% at 17:00, and 6.9% at 21:00 hours. Flow‐mediated dilation at 8:00 and at 12:00 hours was significantly lower than that at 17:00 (p <0.05). Conclusions : These results show that endothelial function has diurnal variation and is significantly attenuated in the morning. Morning attenuation of endothelial function should be recognized in clinical research and may play an important role in the circadian variation of the occurrence of acute cardiovascular events.
Etsuda et al. (Tue,) conducted a observational in Healthy (n=13). Morning time (8:00) vs. Afternoon time (17:00) was evaluated on Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) (p=<0.05). Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation was significantly attenuated in the morning at 8:00 (4.0%) compared to the afternoon at 17:00 (9.7%) (p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: