Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates a Moodle plugin enhancing handwriting recognition in learners, suggesting improved engagement and assessment accuracy.
This study presents the development of a Moodle plugin that integrates a web-based handwriting input interface with handwriting-to-text recognition, supporting handwritten input in Japanese, English, and mathematical and chemical formulas. Although computer-based learning systems are widely used in education, they predominantly emphasize multiple-choice or short-answer question types that require conventional keyboard and mouse input. Conversely, structured responses, such as mathematical and chemical expressions, often require specialized input methods, such as LaTeX and Equation Editor, which are challenging for many learners to use. To address these limitations, we developed a Moodle plugin that provides an intuitive and cognitively efficient handwriting-based input interface. The plugin enables learners to produce handwritten responses naturally while preserving raw handwriting data and recognition texts to support transparent scoring. This study bridges the gap between traditional pencil-and-paper assessments and contemporary digital learning environments. It also enhances the authenticity and interactivity of assessments conducted within Moodle. In particular, this paper describes the architecture of the plugin, implementation, and integration challenges encountered within the Moodle system. Usability testing results indicate the plugin can enhance learner engagement and assessment accuracy, representing a step toward personalized and interactive digital education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Truong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: