Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective chart review assesses syphilis screening rates in pregnant women, indicating major gaps in prevention efforts.
Background: Congenital syphilis rates have risen nationally and in North Carolina (NC). We assessed syphilis screening among pregnant women in NC. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted among patients with a pregnancy episode—created at first prenatal care encounter or labor/delivery—at a NC health system from 1/1/2019-12/31/2023. We estimated the proportion with syphilis screening at timepoints required by NC law (before 28 weeks of gestation, 28-31 weeks of gestation, and within 1 week of delivery) using syphilis test dates and delivery dates. We estimated prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using log binominal regression with generalized estimating equations to explore associations between clinical and sociodemographic factors and syphilis screening. Results: We identified 64,803 pregnancies among 54,446 patients. Syphilis screening was conducted at least once in 99.5% of pregnancies. Only 27.6% had syphilis screening recorded at 28-31 weeks, and 22.0% had all required syphilis screening. Completion of required syphilis screening was more common among women aged 18-24 compared to ≥35 years (PR 1.15; CI: 1.10-1.21), and those who were uninsured compared to privately insured (PR 1.33; CI: 1.27-1.39), but less common among Black/African American women compared to White women (PR 0.93; CI: 0.89-0.96), those who preferred non-English languages for healthcare communication compared to English (PR 0.85; CI 0.81-0.90), and who initiated care in an emergency department compared to a women’s health clinic (PR 0.13; 95% CI: 0.12-0.15). Conclusions: Completion of all required syphilis screening was low among pregnant women, highlighting a major gap in congenital syphilis prevention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sweitzer et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: