Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A reply examines misunderstandings and defends the original definition of evaluative conditioning.
In this paper, I respond to the preprint that was shared by Corneille and colleagues in which they discuss the downsides of my 2007 definition of evaluative conditioning and propose a new definition of evaluative conditioning. After discussing misunderstandings regarding the nature of the functional approach in psychology, I explain why I oppose the three proposed deviations from the 2007 definition and why I believe that many of the downsides that Corneille and colleague discuss are not substantial, have been acknowledged before, and/or can be dealt with without changing the 2007 definition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jan De Houwer (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: