Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is defined by profound heterogeneity, dormant metastatic reservoirs, and rapid therapy resistance. Building on our AI-Driven CRISPR Strategies in Breast Cancer framework, CRISPR–Cas9 is emerging as more than a gene-editing tool, capable of restoring circadian integrity, eliminating dormant clones, and re-programming immune surveillance. A structured PubMed, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov review through 2025 integrated mechanistic, preclinical, and early clinical evidence. Beyond standard knockout, base, and prime editing, we highlight chrono-genomic repair of BMAL1/PER2, dormancy-focused synthetic-lethality screens, and genomic-collapse tactics for BRCA1-deficient tumors. Adaptive AI pipelines that iteratively refine guide RNAs and exosome-mimetic carriers, incorporating Boolean logic gates, were also evaluated for self-regulated, tumor-specific delivery. Proof-of-concept studies show that HER2 deletion, TP53 rescue, and ABCB1 silencing enhance chemosensitivity across luminal, HER2-positive, and TNBC models. Circadian restoration expands therapeutic windows and delays relapse in xenografts. Dormancy-directed CRISPR screens reveal unique vulnerabilities in disseminated tumor cells, whereas genomic collapse selectively destroys BRCA1-mutant clones. Integration with CAR-T cells and antibody–drug conjugates amplifies cytotoxicity, and transient nanoparticle or exosome systems improve solid-tumor penetration while minimizing off-target events. CRISPR–Cas9 is transitioning from a molecular scalpel to an adaptive, self-learning therapeutic ecosystem. By uniting AI-guided design, circadian reprogramming, dormancy eradication, and logic-gated delivery, the strategies detailed here define a next-generation precision-oncology paradigm capable of anticipating tumor evolution, overcoming resistance, and preventing metastatic relapse.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taki et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: