Questionnaire-based study evaluates VR's educational impact in obstetric training for medical students, showing high satisfaction and engagement.
OBJECTIVE: Clinical observation of childbirth is essential in obstetric education; however, opportunities for medical students are increasingly limited due to declining birth rates and the unpredictable timing of delivery. Restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic further reduced in-person learning, highlighting the need for alternative educational approaches. Virtual reality (VR) offers immersive learning opportunities. We developed a 360° real-life VR simulation of vaginal delivery and evaluated its educational utility and student satisfaction. METHODS: VR content was created using omnidirectional and high-definition cameras installed in the delivery and ultrasound rooms at Tottori University Hospital. Students viewed the content using a projection-based VR system (Cave Automatic Virtual Environment; CAVE) and head-mounted displays (HMD). Between February 2023 and April 2025, 220 medical students participating in a clinical clerkship observed childbirth and ultrasonography through VR and completed post-session questionnaires. Valid response numbers varied by questionnaire item because some items were added during the study period. RESULTS: Overall student satisfaction with the VR experience was high across content configurations. Scene-specific satisfaction varied, with relatively lower ratings for ultrasonography. After the VR session, the proportion of students expressing a willingness to observe actual childbirth was 94.2%. Students frequently cited the realism of the VR experience and suggested improvements to explanatory content and audiovisual quality. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is one of the few studies to examine the implementation of 360° "real-life" VR childbirth education for medical students. Real-life VR may support learner engagement and perceived educational value in obstetric training.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nagata et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: