Einstein's static universe failed because no mechanism existed to produce cosmological redshift without metric expansion. We propose that mechanism: the speed of light c decreasing over cosmic time as the causal propagation rate of a discrete Planck-volume spacetime network, governed by N × ℓP³ = constant. This framework produces two classes of physical quantity: those exactly c-independent (hydrogen binding energy, fine structure constant, atomic spectra) and those depending directly on c (t) (redshift, time dilation, Planck length). We adopt the convention ℏ × c = constant — preserving the fine structure constant α and satisfying atomic clock bounds — and derive the normalisation parameter t₀ = λ/H₀ = 3. 69 Gyr, which is explicitly distinct from the LCDM expansion age of 13. 8 Gyr. Three exact results follow: (1) a VSL redshift formula 1+z = c (tₑmit) /c (tₒbs) requiring no metric expansion; (2) supernova time dilation of exactly (1+z), definitively distinguishing the framework from Tired Light; (3) preservation of the hydrogen recombination energy scale at z ~ 1100, where c was approximately seven times its present value. The CMB first acoustic peak position ℓ₁ ~ 220 places a stringent constraint: the VSL parameter λ must be near-zero at z > 0. 4, rising to ~0. 277 only in the late universe. The derivation of this evolving-λ (t) function from first principles is identified as the framework's central open problem. Three falsifiable predictions are made: primordial gravitational wave suppression r ≈ 0 (testable by LiteBIRD ~2028) ; fine-structure constant drift only at z 10, consistent with current JWST observations. Einstein's abandonment of the static universe may have been premature: the mechanism he lacked is a physically motivated variable speed of light grounded in discrete Planck-scale spacetime. This paper is a focused standalone presentation of the core cosmological framework. A seven-paper companion series covering quantum mechanics, antimatter, quantum gravity, QFT, quantum computing, and dark matter is published separately (see Related Works).
James Edward Foweraker (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: