Key result
Pimobendan fails to improve 6-minute walk distance over placebo in HFpEF with RV-PA uncoupling.
Why the study?
Patients with HFpEF and RV-PA uncoupling have poorer outcomes than those without RV-PA uncoupling.
Does pimobendan improve exercise capacity in hospitalized patients with HFpEF and RV-PA uncoupling?
RCT (n=50)
Double-blind
1:1
Yes
Does pimobendan improve exercise capacity in hospitalized patients with HFpEF and RV-PA uncoupling?
In patients with HFpEF and RV-PA uncoupling, 30 days of pimobendan therapy did not significantly improve exercise capacity compared to placebo.
No significant 6MWD benefit in this small RCT; leaves open pimobendan efficacy for larger trials.
Background: Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and right ventricular (RV)–pulmonary arterial (PA) uncoupling, as assessed by a decrease ratio of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) to PA systolic pressure (PASP) on echocardiography, have poorer outcomes than patients without RV-PA uncoupling. Methods and Results: The MONACO trial was an adaptive, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study that enrolled hospitalized patients with HFpEF admitted to 12 centers in Japan. Patients who had left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% and TAPSE/PASP <0.57 mm/mmHg at discharge were randomized 1 : 1 to receive pimobendan 1.25 mg b.i.d. or placebo. The primary objective was to evaluate changes from baseline (day 0) to day 30 in exercise capacity measured by the 6-minute walking test. Enrollment was terminated due to the invalid result of the planned interim analysis. The median age of participants was 82 years and 46% were women. Pimobendan (n=24) or placebo (n=26) was administrated orally. At day 30, mean changes in 6-minute walking distance in patients who received pimobendan (+26.9 m [95% confidence interval; −2.0, +55.8]) or placebo (+21.4 m [95% confidence interval; −14.3, +57.2]) were not significantly different (P=0.402). Conclusions: Among patients with HFpEF and RV-PA uncoupling, administration of pimobendan for 30 days did not result in significant improvement in exercise capacity compared with placebo.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakagawa et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and right ventricular-pulmonary arterial uncoupling (n=50). Pimobendan vs. Placebo was evaluated on Change in 6-minute walking distance from baseline to day 30 (MD 5.5, 95% CI -38.9 to 49.8, p=0.402). Pimobendan did not significantly improve 6-minute walking distance compared to placebo in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and right ventricular-pulmonary arterial uncoupling (MD 5.5 m, p=0.402).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: