Randomized trial evaluates sound insulation and load-bearing in trabecular bone-inspired structures, suggesting design improvements.
Aiming at the technical bottleneck that traditional porous structures can hardly achieve mechanical load-bearing and acoustic regulation simultaneously, this study designs and fabricates three implicit surface porous structures (Gyroid, Diamond, Lidinoid) based on the bionic principle of trabecular bone. Experimental characterization and numerical analysis of their mechano-acoustic coupling performance are systematically carried out. Selective Laser Melting (SLM) technology is employed to realize the integrated forming of 316L bionic structures. Quasi-static compression experiments and finite element simulations are conducted to reveal the progressive deformation mechanism and energy absorption characteristics of different topological configurations. The results indicate that the Diamond structure exhibits the optimal comprehensive performance in terms of load-bearing capacity, specific energy absorption and isotropy. On this basis, the sound absorption and sound insulation performances of the structures are evaluated via an acoustic impedance tube test. The results show that the Diamond structure possesses a remarkably higher sound absorption coefficient and sound insulation value in the high-frequency range than other configurations, demonstrating excellent acoustic energy dissipation and sound wave isolation capability. The research indicates that the synergistic optimization of mechanical and acoustic performances can be achieved by regulating the Triply Periodic Minimal Surface (TPMS) topological configuration. Benefiting from its efficient stress transfer paths and intricate sound wave propagation channels, the Diamond structure realizes the coupling of high load-bearing capacity, superior energy absorption and favorable acoustic performance. This work provides a theoretical basis and technical support for the design of bionic porous structures in multifunctional scenarios such as bone implants and protective noise reduction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: