Compares 2,4-D toxicity on behavior and physiology in amphibian larvae, indicating ecological risks.
The herbicide 2,4-D is extensively employed and detected in surface waters, representing a risk for amphibians. Species of the genus Physalaemus , such as P. gracilis , show sensitivity to the compound even at low concentrations. This study compared the toxicity of the active ingredient (D AI ) and two of its commercial formulations of 2,4-D (DBH 1 and DBH 2 ) on survival, heart rate, swimming activity, and biochemical parameters (TBARS levels and CAT activity) of P. gracilis during its initial development stages. The tested concentrations (5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 µg/L) were selected based on the limits established for 2,4-D in Brazilian freshwater regulations. D AI decreased survival and altered swimming activity at all tested concentrations, increased TBARS levels at 5 and 10 µg/L, and reduced CAT activity at 20 and 25 µg/L. Both commercial formulations also affected survival and swimming activity at all concentrations; DBH 1 reduced heart rate at 15 and 25 µg/L, while DBH 2 increased it at all tested concentrations. Additionally, DBH 1 increased TBARS levels at 15 µg/L in exposed embryos and tadpoles, whereas DBH 2 decreased TBARS levels at 5 µg/L and reduced CAT activity at all tested concentrations. Overall, exposure to 2,4-D and its commercial formulations induced physiological and behavioral alterations in Physalaemus gracilis tadpoles, although the magnitude and direction of the effects varied among compounds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bridi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: