Examines how dual-use quantum technologies are communicated in science, politics, military, and business, highlighting implications for governance.
Quantum technologies are increasingly framed as dual-use, raising concerns about civilian benefits alongside potential military and security applications. This paper examines how dual-use quantum technologies are communicatively constructed across four functionally differentiated domains: science, politics, the military, and business. Rather than treating dual-use as an inherent property of technology, we conceptualize it as a communicative category through which uncertainty, responsibility, and future expectations are negotiated. Drawing on Niklas Luhmann’s systems theory, we analyze a qualitative corpus of scientific publications, policy documents, military strategy reports, and business communications. We show that shared terms such as dual-use, security, and quantum advantage circulate across domains but acquire distinct meanings as they are re-embedded within domain-specific communicative codes. These translations generate both resonance and dissonance, producing structured misalignment rather than convergence. The paper contributes to our understanding of dual-use quantum technologies by reconstructing domain-specific articulations of dual-use, explaining their divergence through functional differentiation, and highlighting implications for responsibility, authority, and governance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nielsen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: