This dataset supports species categorisation for risk assessment in invasion science, suggesting improved screening methods.
In invasion science, risk analysis tools are widely used to support the prevention and management of non-native species introductions. Many decision-support frameworks, including those derived from Weed Risk Assessment methodologies such as the Invasiveness Screening Kit (ISK) family of tools, require calibration of outcome scores to distinguish between higher- and lower-risk species. A prerequisite for such calibration is the a priori categorisation of screened species as invasive or non-invasive based on evidence from their introduced range, when applicable. This paper provides a curated global dataset comprising 1,926 taxa identified from 209 applications of the ISK tools across 266 risk assessment areas worldwide, spanning over 21 years. The taxa were assigned de novo a priori invasion-status categorisations through a standardised verification workflow using authoritative databases and scientific literature. All verification steps and categorisation-evidence sources are recorded in the dataset, ensuring reproducibility of the evidence supporting each final taxon-level categorisation. This dataset provides a standardised reference resource to support calibration and comparative analyses of invasion risk screening applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lorenzo Vilizzi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: