Key result
Intensive systolic blood pressure control (<120 mm Hg) reduced cardiovascular outcomes similarly in participants with (HR 0.75) and without (HR 0.71) metabolic syndrome (P=0.98 for interaction).
Why the study?
Does intensive blood pressure control reduce cardiovascular outcomes in patients with and without metabolic syndrome across different racial/ethnic groups?
RCT (n=9,097)
randomized
Does intensive blood pressure control reduce cardiovascular outcomes in patients with and without metabolic syndrome across different racial/ethnic groups?
Intensive blood pressure control provides consistent cardiovascular benefits regardless of baseline metabolic syndrome status or race/ethnicity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support intensive BP targets regardless of metabolic syndrome; leaves open confirmation in dedicated prospective trials.
AIMS: To determine whether baseline metabolic syndrome (MetS) modifies the effect of intensive blood pressure control on cardiovascular (CV) outcomes, and whether the effects varied by race/ethnicity. METHODS: We performed post hoc analyses among non-Hispanic black, non-hispanic white and Hispanic participants, with and without MetS, in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT), who were randomized to a systolic blood pressure (SBP) target of <120 mm Hg (intensive group, N = 4544) or an SBP target of <140 mm Hg (standard group, N = 4553). The median follow-up was 3.26 years. The primary outcome was the composite of the first occurrence of myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, non-myocardial infarction acute coronary syndrome or CV death. RESULTS: ; P < .01), but were similar across treatment arms in the non-MetS subgroup. The hazard ratio for the primary outcome was similarly reduced in participants with or without baseline MetS: 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57, 0.96) and 0.71 (95% CI 0.57, 0.87), respectively (adjusted P value for treatment by subgroup interaction = .98). Similarly, there was no evidence of treatment × MetS subgroup interaction for all-cause mortality (adjusted interaction P value = .98). The findings were also similar across race/ethnic subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis the CV benefit of intensive SBP control did not differ among participants by baseline MetS status, regardless of race/ethnicity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dungan et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in Hypertension and Metabolic Syndrome (n=9,097). Intensive blood pressure control vs. Standard blood pressure control (SBP target <140 mm Hg) was evaluated on Composite of the first occurrence of myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, non-myocardial infarction acute coronary syndrome or CV death (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.57-0.96, p=0.98 for interaction). Intensive systolic blood pressure control (<120 mm Hg) reduced cardiovascular outcomes similarly in participants with (HR 0.75) and without (HR 0.71) metabolic syndrome (P=0.98 for interaction).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: