Why the study?
Prior studies regarding the use of aromatase inhibitors and cardiovascular disease risk have yielded conflicting results in postmenopausal breast cancer survivors.
Does aromatase inhibitor use increase the risk of cardiovascular disease in postmenopausal breast cancer survivors?
Does aromatase inhibitor use increase the risk of cardiovascular disease in postmenopausal breast cancer survivors?
Prolonged use (>4 years) of aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal breast cancer survivors is associated with an increased risk of incident arrhythmias and acute ischemic heart disease.
May indicate higher heart failure risk with aromatase inhibitors; hypothesis-generating and should not change practice without prospective confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Prior studies regarding use of Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) have shown conflicting results. This retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate whether AIs use affects risk for CVD events in postmenopausal breast cancer survivors. METHODS: Using a retrospective cohort study design, four CVD outcomes; heart failure or cardiomyopathy, arrhythmia, acute ischemic heart disease and ischemic stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack were compared with uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses according to exposure to endocrine therapy (use of AI, tamoxifen or AI/tamoxifen sequentially) or no endocrine therapy. RESULTS: In total 15815 postmenopausal women, surgically treated to early breast cancer during 2006-2012, were included. No significantly increased risk for CVD events was observed in patients with AI use in the whole cohort. However, two subgroup analyses showed increased risk for CVD events in the AI/tamoxifen sequential group; heart failure in patients older than 75 years (Hazard Ratio (HR) 2.44; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.32-4.54) and arrhythmia in patients without prior CVD (HR 1.45; 95% CI: 1.01-2.10). An increased risk for arrhythmia and acute ischemic heart disease in patients with at least four years of AI treatment compared with no or short-time exposure was observed (HR 2.12; 95% CI: 1.40-3.25 for arrhythmia; HR 2.03; 95% CI: 1.15-3.58 for ischemic heart disease). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate an increased risk for ischemic heart disease and arrhythmia in patients treated for more than four years with AIs. This should be considered in the risk-benefit assessment concerning endocrine therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sund et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: