Why the study?
The association between aromatase inhibitors and cardiovascular outcomes is controversial, and their cardiotoxicity as sequential treatments with tamoxifen remains unknown.
Does switching to sequential aromatase inhibitors increase the risk of cardiovascular outcomes compared to continuing tamoxifen in women with nonmetastatic breast cancer?
Does switching to sequential aromatase inhibitors increase the risk of cardiovascular outcomes compared to continuing tamoxifen in women with nonmetastatic breast cancer?
In women with nonmetastatic breast cancer, switching from tamoxifen to sequential aromatase inhibitors is associated with a doubled risk of myocardial infarction compared to continuing tamoxifen.
Sequential AI use after tamoxifen was not linked to higher CV risk; leaves open need for confirmatory RCTs before changing practice.
The association between use of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and cardiovascular outcomes is controversial. While some observational studies have assessed the cardiovascular safety of AIs as upfront treatments, their cardiotoxicity as sequential treatments with tamoxifen remains unknown. Thus, we conducted a population-based cohort study using data from the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to the Hospital Episode Statistics and Office for National Statistics databases. We employed a prevalent new-user design to propensity-score match, in a 1:2 ratio, patients switching from tamoxifen to AIs with patients continuing tamoxifen between 1998 and 2016. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the study outcomes (myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, heart failure, and cardiovascular mortality). Overall, 1,962 patients switching to AIs were matched to 3,874 patients continuing tamoxifen. Compared with tamoxifen, AIs were associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.08, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02, 4.27). The hazard ratios were elevated for ischemic stroke (HR = 1.58, 95% CI: 0.85, 2.93) and heart failure (HR = 1.69, 95% CI: 0.79, 3.62) but not cardiovascular mortality (HR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.49, 1.54), with confidence intervals including the null value. The elevated hazard ratios observed for the cardiovascular outcomes should be corroborated in future large observational studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khosrow‐Khavar et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: