Key result
Aromatase inhibitors were not significantly associated with an altered risk of myocardial infarction compared to non-users in women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer (HR 0.98).
Why the study?
The cardiovascular toxicity of aromatase inhibitors for women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer is controversial.
Do aromatase inhibitors affect the risk of myocardial infarction in women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer?
Meta-Analysis (n=134,476)
Do aromatase inhibitors affect the risk of myocardial infarction in women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer?
Hazard Ratio: 0.98 (95% CI 0.83–1.17)
Absolute Event Rate: 1.2% vs 0.96%
Real-world data suggests that aromatase inhibitors do not increase the risk of myocardial infarction in women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, and may even reduce the risk in those without a history of cardiovascular disease.
Aromatase inhibitors do not increase MI risk in ER+ breast cancer; confirms cardiovascular safety and supports guideline-directed use.
BACKGROUND: The cardiovascular toxicity of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) for women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer is controversial. We aimed to evaluate the association between AIs and the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) in women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer based on real-world studies. METHOD: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify studies that estimated the association between MI risk and AIs. A random-effects model was used to evaluate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the predefined outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 134 476 patients from eight cohort studies were enrolled in our analysis. For MI incidence, no significant difference was found between the users of AIs and non-users (HR: .98, 95% CI: .83-1.17). The subgroup analysis of patients without a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) suggested a reduced risk of MI (HR: .86, 95% CI: .77-.96). No significant difference was found for ischemic stroke (HR: .93, 95% CI: .82-1.07) and heart failure (HR: 1.24, 95% CI: .92-1.66) between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Based on real-world data, AIs may be a safe treatment route for patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer and those with a history of CVD. AIs caused a major decrease in MI in patients without CVD history. However, more in-depth investigations are needed to explore the association between AI use and the incidence of MI in the treatment of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2022) conducted a meta-analysis in Estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer (n=134,476). Aromatase inhibitors vs. Non-users (tamoxifen or no hormonal treatment) was evaluated on Myocardial infarction incidence (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.83-1.17). Aromatase inhibitors were not significantly associated with an altered risk of myocardial infarction compared to non-users in women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer (HR 0.98).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: