Why the study?
Cardiovascular events reduce quality of life in breast cancer patients receiving aromatase inhibitors, but this risk has not been sufficiently addressed.
Does aromatase inhibitor treatment increase the risk of cardiovascular events in breast cancer patients?
Does aromatase inhibitor treatment increase the risk of cardiovascular events in breast cancer patients?
Aromatase inhibitors as a class do not significantly increase the overall risk of cardiovascular events in breast cancer patients compared to controls, though exemestane may carry a slightly higher risk.
Supports CV safety of aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer; confirms neutral effect and bolsters guideline-directed use.
Background : Cardiovascular events (CVEs) was considered as one of the primary cause to reduce the quality of life in breast cancer patients with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) treatment, which has not been sufficiently addressed. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between risk of CVEs and AIs in patients with breast cancer. Methods: Included studies were obtained from the databases of Embase, Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Clinical Trials.gov, and reference lists. The main outcome measures were overall incidence, odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Furthermore, the association and the risk differences among different tumor types, AIs ,ages,or treatment regimens were conducted. Fixed-effect or random-effect models were applied in the statistical analyses according to the heterogeneity. Our analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Results: Seventeen studies, which included 44411 subjects, were included in our analyses.The overall incidence of CVEs in AIs group was 13.02% (95% CI: 8.15%–20.17%) and almost all of the high-grade CVEs occurred in patients treated with AIs . The pooled ORs of CVEs was 0.9940 (95% CI: 0.8545 -1.1562 ). Under sub-gro up analysis, the incidence of CVEs related to exemestane was high er than that of controls (OR=1.1564, 95% CI: 1.0656-1.2549) , but no statistical differences in risk of CVEs were found in other sub-group analysis. No evidence of publication bias was found for incidence of CVEs in our meta-analysis by a funnel plot. Conclusions: These results suggest that p atients with breast cancer treated with AIs do not have a significant risk of developing CVEs in comparison with the controls, and exemestane might not be considered as the alternative AI to the breast cancer patients from the perspective of CVEs . Further studies are recommended to investigate this association and the risk differences among different tumor types, AIs or treatment regimens.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: