Key result
Glucose-based staging after FINDRISC identifies high-risk adults with up to ~15-fold greater diabetes risk.
Why the study?
Does a multistage schema using FINDRISC and 1-h oral glucose tolerance test accurately stratify the risk of incident diabetes in adults?
Cohort (n=962)
Does a multistage schema using FINDRISC and 1-h oral glucose tolerance test accurately stratify the risk of incident diabetes in adults?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A two-step screening approach using FINDRISC followed by fasting and 1-hour glucose testing effectively stratifies diabetes risk while reducing the need for full OGTT testing.
Aims We aimed to develop a multistage schema to stratify diabetes risk using continuous plasma glucose (PG) values (fasting and 1 h) in combination with clinical variables. Methods In 962 Brazilian adults, we initially estimated the probability of developing diabetes with the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC). We then stratified participants with a FINDRISC score of 9 or higher into three progressive high-risk stages based on their probability of developing diabetes. We evaluated the schemás ability to predict the incidence of diabetes using robust Poisson regression with a time offset, employing bootstrap resampling for internal validation. Results Over 5.31 (0.44) years of follow-up, we observed a steep and graded increase in the risk of diabetes across stages. Initiating screening with FINDRISC reduced OGTT testing by 35.1%. The staging schema categorized 39.1% (36.1–42.2) of the sample in three high-risk stages, with relative risk for incident diabetes ranging from 2.7 (1.0–7.4) to 14.9 (7.3–30.3). Adding 2 h PG and HbA 1c to scores produced little change. Conclusions A staging schema based on scores derived from continuous FPG and 1 h PG values along with clinical variables, applied after a FINDRISC screening, offers a nuanced and practical approach to identifying individuals for diabetes prevention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bracco et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Type 2 diabetes risk (n=962). Staging schema based on continuous FPG and 1 h PG values along with clinical variables vs. Lower risk stages was evaluated on Incident diabetes (RR 2.7 to 14.9, 95% CI 1.0-7.4 to 7.3-30.3). A staging schema using fasting and 1-hour plasma glucose after FINDRISC screening categorized 39.1% of adults into high-risk stages, with relative risks for incident diabetes ranging from 2.7 to 14.9.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: