Case report discusses clinical challenges in managing MODY with a rare HNF1A variant in a family, indicating incomplete penetrance.
Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) is a monogenic form of diabetes characterized by autosomal dominant inheritance, typically occurring during adolescence or early adulthood. Mutations in the hepatocyte nuclear factor 1-α (HNF1A) gene are among the most common causes of MODY and are frequently misdiagnosed as type 1 (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D), leading to inappropriate management. We report the case of a preschool-aged boy who presented with polyuria and polydipsia, fasting hyperglycemia, negative pancreatic autoantibodies, and an elevated C-peptide level. A multi-generational family history of diabetes was noted, and his older sister was previously diagnosed with T2D. Genetic testing using direct sequencing identified a rare heterozygous silent variant in exon 8 of the HNF1A gene (c.1533G>A; p. Gln511=) in the index patient, his sister, and his mother. To date, the mother remains entirely asymptomatic and normoglycemic. The variant is exceptionally rare in global population databases. Both siblings have maintained optimal glycemic control for four years through dietary modification alone, without requiring pharmacological therapy. This case demonstrates that rare silent HNF1A variants can be clinically pathogenic, likely by disrupting pre-mRNA splicing kinetics or mRNA stability. The observed familial segregation strongly suggests a clinical pattern of incomplete penetrance (an asymptomatic maternal carrier) and variable expressivity, potentially pointing to an attenuated, partial genetic defect rather than a complete loss of function. This case underscores the importance of integrating rigorous clinical phenotyping and familial segregation tracking alongside automated in silico predictions when evaluating synonymous variants in suspected monogenic diabetes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carvalho et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: