Framework integrates mechanisation, logistics optimisation, and digital tools for sustainable agricultural practices in Sub-Saharan Africa, suggesting effective pathways for transformation.
Naming fragmentation as the reason agricultural systems underperform in Sub-Saharan Africa is well-established. What isn't established is how to build integration where infrastructure, data, and institutional capacity are all simultaneously constrained. This article addresses that gap directly. The Integrated Agricultural Systems Framework (IASF) proposed here is a design instrument, not a diagnosis. It specifies how three functional domains, namely mechanisation, logistics optimisation, and digital decision tools, connect through defined interfaces, in what sequence those interfaces should be built, and how system-level sustainability outcomes emerge from their interaction rather than from the performance of any single domain. The framework draws on systems thinking methodology, specifically feedback loop analysis and intervention point theory. It is applied across four commodity systems widely produced in south-west Nigeria, covering cassava, rice, oil palm, and groundnut, to demonstrate that the integration architecture holds across crop types and chain structures. Each application identifies which interface layer is the binding constraint, what minimum viable data the real-time information layer requires, and what sustainability co-benefits integration produces that no single-domain intervention can achieve. Transferability conditions are stated explicitly so the framework can be applied and tested in other low-income agricultural contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gabriel Eboseta Peter (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: