In this thesis, I argue that primary identities outside of race similarly divide whites and Hispanics along party lines, namely not holding a four year college degree, being an Evangelical Christian, and living in a rural area. I refer to this identity structure that comprises white and Hispanic Republican support as the 'populist alignment.' By examining Latino politics through the lens of populist alignment, I argue that scholars must move to interrogate Hispanics' position in the U.S. structure of bipolar racial order through their proximity to whites instead of Blacks. I begin this thesis with a review of the literature on Hispanic Republicans, followed by an explanation of my theoretical approach in studying Hispanic voting patterns in the 2016 and 2024 presidential elections. I argue that the analysis of Hispanic voters must be disaggregated from the current approaches to African American politics, as Hispanics behaved more like whites than Blacks in the last decade. I then explain my methodology in testing my two hypotheses, which are: (1) Hispanics were significantly more likely to vote for a Republican candidate in the 2016 and 2024 presidential elections than Blacks, and (2) Hispanics were moved to vote for a Republican candidate by a populist alignment. I discuss the results of my logit regressions and analyze the significance of the empirical findings for my proposed theory. Finally, I end with suggestions for future research and defend my critiques of the current academic approaches to studying racial minority politics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elizaveta Gorelik (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: