Uncovers improved behavioral prediction in autism spectrum disorder using age-stratified features, indicating the necessity for personalized approaches.
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a group of highly heterogeneous neurodevelopmental disorders with onset in early childhood. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have revealed that ASD is related to altered functional connectivity (AFC), and that individual-specific change isolated from AFC with data-driven method of individuals with ASD has enhanced the predictive ability for behavioral symptoms. Although few studies have incorporated age as a factor, it is critically important for ASD, a neurodevelopmental disorder, as age influences the disorder’s onset and progression. In this study, we analyzed 437 participants (208 ASD, 229 typical development) from the Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange, employed the common orthogonal basis extraction (COBE) algorithm to isolate age-stratified individual-specific features and examine their predictive abilities for clinical behaviors. A validation analysis was performed in an independent sample. We found that the age-stratified, individual-specific features improved behavioral prediction. The most substantial improvement was observed in predicting social behavior among adolescents with ASD, which showed a peak increase of 133% (0.35 [var = 0.10] vs. 0.15 [0.15]) and an average increase of 41% compared to AFC. These findings were replicated in an independent validation dataset. The age-stratified individual-specific features demonstrate superior predictive power for clinical symptoms. This underscores the critical importance of incorporating both inter-individual variability and the developmental perspective into ASD biomarker exploration and targeted intervention research. Individual-specific features improve the predictive ability of clinical symptoms. Variation in prediction accuracy was observed across age groups, with the most pronounced improvement occurring in the adolescent group. The correlations of L2-norm, representing the strength of brain network, and clinical symptoms exhibited significant different across age groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: