Mixed-methods study evaluates clinical supervision training program effectiveness for mental health nurses, suggesting need for sustained support.
Background Clinical supervision is widely recognised as a valuable method of workplace support and professional development. Effective supervision requires clinical supervisors to be trained on theory and practice. Oftentimes, training is interdisciplinary and may not address discipline-specific needs. Aim This study evaluated the implementation of a clinical supervision training program developed specifically for mental health nurses and informed by community and consumer involvement. Methods A convergent parallel mixed-method design was used. A purposeful sample of 18 mental health nurses who completed the training program participated. Data collection included the Acceptability, Feasibility, Appropriateness Scale and open-ended qualitative survey responses. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, with exploratory correlation analysis, and qualitative data were analysed thematically. Findings Quantitative results identified that mental health nurses were satisfied with the clinical supervision training program. Qualitative feedback revealed two themes: (i) learning experience and (ii) relevance and impact of learning. Integrated findings indicated strong satisfaction with the training content and identified key considerations for translation to clinical practice. The discipline-specific clinical supervision training was acceptable and appropriate for mental health nursing practice. Discussion Discipline-specific training can effectively prepare clinical supervisors. However, successful translation to practice depends on organisational support beyond individual training. Conclusion While the training supported confidence and improved knowledge of clinical supervisors, further considerations for sustainable implementation of supervision in mental health nursing practice are required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hamilton et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: