Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines how language is displayed and valued in shop signs, revealing its legitimization in tourism markets.
This study examines the shop-sign landscape of Hurghada’s tourism-commercial field to investigate how languages are distributed, visually organised, and socially legitimised in a tourism-oriented marketplace. Drawing on Bourdieu’s framework of cultural capital, it adopts a sequential multi-method design that combines a distributional analysis of 1,293 shop signs, a qualitative visual analysis of representative signs, and semi-structured interviews with 20 merchants and 20 tourists. The findings reveal a clear linguistic hierarchy rather than a random coexistence of codes: English occupied the most dominant and visible position, Arabic retained an important role in local grounding and practical accessibility, and Russian functioned as a more selective resource associated with specific tourist groups. Beyond these distributional patterns, the study shows that language in shop signs operates as more than a communicative tool. It is differentially valued by merchants, materialised through visual and commercial display, and gradually normalised as a legitimate form of tourism-facing business presentation. The study contributes to linguistic landscape research by moving beyond descriptive patterning toward a process-oriented account of how linguistic resources acquire market value and symbolic legitimacy within tourism-commercial space.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: