The study demonstrates a falsifiable model of dark energy in an emergent gravity framework, indicating no phantom crossing in its predictions.
This work investigates whether a late-time dark-energy sector built on emergent gravity from the IKKT matrix model and Yang's symplectic framework can reproduce the equation-of-state behaviour currently favoured by DESI DR2. The model is a holographic "frozen-horizon" condensate: a cooling (Gibbons–Hawking) phase transition crystallises the vacuum at a redshift z† and freezes the holographic IR cutoff, producing a de Sitter–like component. The mechanism yields two sharp predictions — a transition at z† ≈ 0.4–0.65 and a present-day equation of state w₀ = −7/9 ≈ −0.778 — together with a structural ceiling: the dark-energy equation of state cannot cross w = −1 (no phantom). We test this against a fully calibrated compressed CMB likelihood (R, ℓ_A, ω_b; Planck 2018 distance priors) combined with the full-covariance DESI DR2 BAO data. Under the complete CMB the data prefer a phantom crossing at ~2.45σ, in a region the model is structurally forbidden to reach. We then examine whether the one available escape — a w < −1 contribution from the higher-spin/torsion modes neglected in Steinacker's C_μλ derivation, or an apparent w < −1 from the IKKT "mirage-matter" modified-Friedmann sector — can be derived. We find it cannot: a fundamental w < −1 is blocked by an IKKT no-ghost theorem, the neglected modes are dark-matter-like (wrong direction), and the mirage sector supplies no apparent phantom either. We therefore report this as a clean, falsifiable result rather than a model claim: this class of emergent-gravity dark energy predicts w(z) ≥ −1 for all z, with w₀ = −7/9 and a transition near z† ≈ 0.4–0.65. A genuine, model-independent phantom crossing established at z ≳ 2 (by Subaru PFS, DESI DR3, Rubin, Euclid, or Roman over 2026–2028) would rule the class out; a confirmation of w ≥ −1 would leave it viable. A full honesty table of what is derived versus assumed or borrowed is included. The record contains the LaTeX source and compiled PDF, the calibrated CMB+BAO likelihood code, the phantom-escape and mirage-matter analyses, and the complete session log. Analysis was assisted by Claude (Anthropic).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Topbas Alparslan (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: