Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mixed-method study explores how leadership and support affect subjective well-being among university employees, highlighting self-efficacy's role.
This study examined the relationships among leadership, workplace social interaction, perceived support, self-efficacy, and subjective well-being (SWB) among employees in a Malaysian public university. Grounded primarily in Social Cognitive Theory, the study employed an explanatory sequential mixed-method design. Quantitative data were collected from 522 academic and non-academic staff and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), followed by semi-structured interviews with eight participants. The findings revealed that perceived support positively influenced self-efficacy, whereas leadership demonstrated a significant negative relationship with self-efficacy. Workplace social interaction did not significantly influence self-efficacy. Self-efficacy significantly predicted SWB and mediated the relationships between leadership, perceived support, and SWB. Qualitative findings indicated that supportive leadership enhanced well-being, whereas excessive monitoring, unclear expectations, and workload pressures undermined employees’ confidence and psychological functioning. Overall, the findings suggest that organizational influences on SWB within higher education environments may be context-dependent rather than uniformly positive.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: