Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This work treats two quantities usually taken as inputs — the number of spatial dimensions and the scale of the vacuum energy — as things to be derived from a single complex field, a “spectral substrate,” under one assumption: exact scale invariance. Every result is tagged by its epistemic status (proved, computed, argued, or exploratory), and the central claims are kept strictly separate from the lower-grade material, so the reader always knows what rests on a theorem and what on a model. The proved/computed core: topological stability of matter forces a complex field with at least two spatial axes; a third appears once the field propagates along its spectral direction, fixing the spectral dimension at three in the ultraviolet and — via a closed-form heat-kernel theorem — across the entire scale-invariant window. The same scale invariance fixes the coherence scale as the geometric mean of the Planck and de Sitter cutoffs, ℓ_s = (ℏG/c³Λ)^(1/4) ≈ 0.04 mm, and excludes the catastrophic vacuum-energy functional — a conditional resolution of the cosmological-constant problem. Reflection positivity is proved, and the continued Euclidean direction is the condensate-activated phase fiber, so matter, masses, and time switch on together in one symmetry breaking. Explicitly exploratory, lower-grade sectors then ask what such a substrate could host: a ghost-free emergent graviton with all corrections Planck-suppressed (the framework predicts its own laboratory invisibility), a non-abelian matter sector forced once the matter scale is generated dynamically, a gapped vector-like emergent fermion, and meV-scale Majorana-neutrino signatures tied to the dark-energy scale. The chirality of Standard-Model matter is located as a single sharp open question — not claimed solved. Falsifiable handle: the dark-energy equation of state obeys w(z) ≥ −1 with no phantom crossing; a confirmed phantom branch would falsify the dark-energy account. Two further meV-scale tests — neutrinoless double-beta decay and the neutrino-mass sum — are tied to the same scale. This is a self-archived preprint and an ongoing research program, not a peer-reviewed result. The dimensional and dark-energy results rest on proofs and validated numerical checks; the gravitational and matter sectors are consistency arguments and model computations, flagged as such throughout.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karol Frank (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: