Key result
Survey of European LAAC centers reveals significant regional heterogeneity in planning, techniques, and post-procedural management.
Why the study?
The survey aimed to describe current preprocedural planning, procedural techniques, and post-implantation management of left atrial appendage closure across Europe.
What are the contemporary European practices regarding preprocedural planning, procedural techniques, and post-implantation management for left atrial appendage closure?
Population
357 participating European LAAC centres in 14 countries
Design
Prospective survey
Authors
Loading...
Substantial European LAAC practice variation warrants caution in adopting local protocols; leaves open which planning, guidance, and antithrombotic strategies optimize outcomes.
Cross-Sectional (n=357)
Yes
What are the contemporary European practices regarding preprocedural planning, procedural techniques, and post-implantation management for left atrial appendage closure?
A European survey reveals widespread adoption of LAAC but highlights significant regional heterogeneity in preprocedural planning, procedural techniques, and post-procedural antithrombotic regimens.
Garot et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Left atrial appendage closure (n=357). Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) practice was evaluated on Current preprocedural planning, procedure techniques and post-implantation management of LAAC. A survey of 357 European centers performing 9,447 LAAC procedures revealed significant regional heterogeneity in preprocedural planning, procedural techniques, and post-procedural management.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: