Why the study?
The prognostic impact of worsening renal function in acute heart failure remains debated, and little is known about indicators of successful decongestion in the very acute phase.
Does the percent reduction in BNP within 48 hours modify the prognostic impact of worsening renal function on 1-year mortality in patients with acute heart failure?
Does the percent reduction in BNP within 48 hours modify the prognostic impact of worsening renal function on 1-year mortality in patients with acute heart failure?
In the very acute phase of acute heart failure, a lower percent reduction in BNP identifies patients in whom worsening renal function is associated with significantly higher 1-year mortality.
AIMS: The prognostic impact of worsening renal function (WRF) in patients with acute heart failure (AHF) remains under debate. Successful decongestion might offset the negative impact of WRF, but little is known about indicators of successful decongestion in the very acute phase of AHF. We hypothesized that decongestion as evaluated by the percent reduction in brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) could identify relevant prognostic implications of WRF in the very acute phase of AHF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data on 907 consecutive hospitalized patients with AHF in the REALITY-AHF study (age: 78±12 years; 55.1% male) were analyzed. Creatinine and BNP were measured at baseline and 48 hours from admission. WRF was defined as an increase in creatinine >0.3 mg at 48 hours from admission. The primary endpoint was 1-year all-cause mortality. Patients were divided into four groups according to the presence/absence of WRF and a BNP reduction higher/lower than the median: no-WRF/higher-BNP-reduction (n = 390), no-WRF/lower-BNP-reduction (n = 397), WRF/higher-BNP-reduction (n = 63), and WRF/lower-BNP-reduction groups (n = 57). Kaplan-Meier curve analysis showed that the WRF/lower-BNP-reduction group had a worse prognosis than the other groups. In a Cox regression analysis, only the WRF/lower-BNP-reduction group had higher mortality compared to the no-WRF/higher-BNP-reduction group (hazard ratio: 3.34, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: In the very acute phase of AHF, BNP reduction may aid in identifying relevant prognostic significance of WRF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoshioka et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: