Key result
Bleeding risk scores show low-to-moderate discrimination for short-term major bleeding in older PE patients.
Why the study?
Do bleeding risk scores accurately predict short-term major bleeding in older patients with acute pulmonary embolism receiving anticoagulation?
Do bleeding risk scores accurately predict short-term major bleeding in older patients with acute pulmonary embolism receiving anticoagulation?
Commonly used bleeding risk scores have limited ability to predict short-term major bleeding or clinically relevant non-major bleeding in older patients with acute pulmonary embolism.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Existing bleeding scores show limited short-term accuracy in older PE patients on anticoagulation; leaves open validation of improved models.
BACKGROUND: Older patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) are at increased risk of bleeding, which is associated with adverse outcomes, making early risk assessment particularly important. This study evaluated the short-term performance of commonly used bleeding risk scores in patients aged ≥65 years. METHODS: An analysis was conducted in a multicenter, prospective study of patients aged ≥65 years with PE receiving anticoagulation (NCT02943343, 2016). The performance of the PE-SARD, Kuijer, RIETE, BACS, and ATRIA scores was evaluated using the time-dependent area under the curve (AUC) analysis. Calibration was assessed with calibration plots. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values were calculated. The primary outcomes were major bleeding (MB) at 7 and 14 days. RESULTS: Among 3661 anticoagulated patients aged ≥65 years with acute PE, MB occurred in 18 (0.5%) and 36 (1.0%) patients at 7 and 14 days, respectively, and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) in 69 (1.9%) and 105 (2.9%) patients. Patients with bleeding events had higher mortality than those without bleeding. Discrimination for short-term MB was low to moderate across scores, with RIETE (AUC 0.76, 95% CI 0.65-0.87) and PE-SARD (AUC 0.74, 95% CI 0.63-0.85) showing the most consistent performance at 7 days. Overall discrimination declined at 14 days. All scores demonstrated limited ability to predict CRNMB, and no model showed a consistent net clinical benefit. CONCLUSIONS: In older patients with PE, bleeding risk scores showed low-to-moderate discrimination for short-term bleeding, with moderate early performance observed only in selected scores. None of the scores reliably identified CRNMB, highlighting the limitations of baseline risk assessment in acute care settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tao et al. (2026) studied this question. Bleeding risk scores had low-to-moderate discrimination for short-term major bleeding in older pulmonary embolism patients, with RIETE and PE-SARD performing best at 7 days.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: