Key result
Dynamic changes in VAC and SOFA scores identify three distinct phenotypes in early septic shock.
Why the study?
Does dynamic ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC) monitoring identify distinct recovery and deterioration phenotypes in adults with septic shock?
Cohort (n=116)
No
Does dynamic ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC) monitoring identify distinct recovery and deterioration phenotypes in adults with septic shock?
Monitoring dynamic changes in ventricular-arterial coupling during the first 48 hours of septic shock can identify distinct phenotypes of organ recovery or deterioration.
Dynamic VAC monitoring may delineate septic shock phenotypes; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
Rationale Septic shock is characterized by highly variable cardiovascular responses despite standardized resuscitation. Ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC), defined as the ratio of arterial elastance (Ea) to left ventricular end-systolic elastance (Ees), may reveal clinically meaningful trajectories not captured by conventional metrics (e.g., cardiac output). We sought to identify phenotypes of early changes in VAC and organ dysfunction in septic shock. Methods We conducted a prospective cohort study of adult patients with septic shock admitted to a single intensive care unit within 48 hours of diagnosis. VAC was computed using the Chen single-beat method from echocardiographic and bedside hemodynamic measurements. VAC and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score were assessed at 24 and 48 hours after ICU admission. Changes were defined as ΔVAC and ΔSOFA (48h-24h). Principal component analysis (PCA) and k-means clustering were used to identify phenotypes based on ΔVAC and ΔSOFA. Results Among 116 patients, PCA-based k-means clustering identified three phenotypes: progressive dysfunction (n = 38), stable(n = 18), and recovery (n = 60). In progressive dysfunction, VAC increased from 1.5 (IQR 1.3-2.1) to 2.0 (IQR 1.5-2.7) and SOFA increased from 6.0 (IQR 4.2-7.0) to 7.5 (IQR 6.0-8.8) (both p < 0.05). In the stable phenotype, VAC (1.4 to 1.6) and SOFA (6.0 to 7.0) did not change significantly (p = 0.15 and p = 0.11, respectively). In recovery, VAC decreased from 1.7 (IQR 1.3-2.3) to 1.5 (IQR 1.2-1.9) and SOFA decreased from 8.0 (IQR 6.0-10.0) to 6.0 (IQR 5.0-7.3) (both p < 0.05). Conclusions Early septic shock exhibits distinct VAC-SOFA dynamic phenotypes, highlighting heterogeneity in cardiovascular efficiency and organ dysfunction trajectories. VAC monitoring may provide actionable physiologic information beyond conventional hemodynamic variables and support personalized resuscitation strategies. Funding source None.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alvarado et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Septic shock (n=116). Ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC) and SOFA score monitoring was evaluated on Phenotypes based on early changes in VAC and SOFA scores (48h-24h). Dynamic changes in ventricular-arterial coupling and SOFA scores identified three distinct phenotypes in early septic shock: progressive dysfunction (n=38), stable (n=18), and recovery (n=60).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: