Key result
Disease knowledge is linked to better preventive practices through improved attitudes in hypertensive aortic disease.
Cross-Sectional (n=619)
No
Effect estimate: β = 0.155 (95% CI 0.111-0.209)
p-value: p=0.006
Hypertensive patients with aortic dissection and aneurysm demonstrate insufficient disease-related knowledge but relatively favorable attitudes and practices, with knowledge indirectly influencing preventive practices through attitudes.
Suggests educational interventions targeting knowledge may improve preventive practices by shaping patient attitudes; leaves open whether.
Purpose: To investigate the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of hypertensive patients with aortic dissection (AD) and aortic aneurysm regarding AD and its prevention. Patients and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at Henan Chest Hospital between September 15, 2023, and December 15, 2023. Patients with hypertension and either Stanford type A or B AD, ascending aortic aneurysm, or abdominal aortic aneurysm were invited to participate. Results: A total of 619 participants were included, of whom 521 (84.17%) were male. Their knowledge, attitude, and practice scores were 4.12± 1.25 (range: 0– 22), 35.41± 3.92 (range: 10– 50), and 28.07± 2.96 (range: 8– 40), respectively. Mediation analysis revealed that knowledge directly influenced attitudes (β = 0.338, P = 0.010), and attitudes directly influenced practices (β = 0.458, P = 0.005). Moreover, knowledge had an indirect effect on practices through attitudes (β = 0.155, P = 0.006). In the subgroup of patients with confirmed aortic dissection (n = 605), the mediation pattern was replicated. Conclusion: Hypertensive patients with AD and aortic aneurysm demonstrated markedly insufficient disease-related knowledge alongside relatively favorable attitudes and moderately engaged self-reported practices toward AD prevention. This imbalance suggests that certain preventive behaviors may occur despite limited disease-specific understanding, indicating a possible separation between knowledge and action. However, given the cross-sectional and self-reported nature of the data, the findings should be interpreted as descriptive patterns rather than evidence of causal relationships or intervention effectiveness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension with aortic dissection or aortic aneurysm (n=619). Knowledge had a significant indirect effect on preventive practices through attitudes (β = 0.155) among hypertensive patients with aortic dissection and aneurysm.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: