Key result
ROTAVI registry details procedural timing of TAVI and rotational atherectomy without reporting clinical outcomes.
Why the study?
Does the procedural timing of TAVI and PCI with rotational atherectomy impact clinical outcomes in patients with severe aortic stenosis and calcified coronary artery disease?
Observational
Yes
Does the procedural timing of TAVI and PCI with rotational atherectomy impact clinical outcomes in patients with severe aortic stenosis and calcified coronary artery disease?
This multicenter registry aims to evaluate the optimal sequencing of TAVI and PCI with rotational atherectomy in patients with severe aortic stenosis and calcified coronary artery disease.
The coexistence of aortic stenosis (AS) and coronary artery disease (CAD) represents a complex clinical scenario, frequently requiring both TAVI and percutaneous coronary intervention with rotational atherectomy (RA). The optimal sequencing of these procedures remains undefined, as well as the hemodynamic impact associated with each procedural strategy. This multicenter retrospective registry, including 12 high-volume centers across Italy, France and Spain, aimed to evaluate the impact of procedural timing on clinical outcomes and to provide insights into contemporary operator decision-making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cesario et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Severe aortic stenosis and calcified coronary artery disease. Procedural timing of TAVI and PCI with rotational atherectomy was evaluated. The abstract describes the ROTAVI multicenter registry evaluating the impact of procedural timing for TAVI and rotational atherectomy on clinical outcomes, but reports no quantitative results.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: