Systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates outcomes of redo transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus valve-in-surgical-valve procedures, highlighting optimal reintervention strategies.
With the expanding use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in younger patients, the need for reintervention on failed bioprostheses is rising. Comparative evidence between redo TAVR for failed transcatheter valves (TAV-in-TAV) and TAVR for failed surgical valves (TAV-in-SAV) is limited.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghannam et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: