What question did this study set out to answer?

To correct errors found in the previously published research on generative AI and employee performance.

June 26, 2026

Corrigendum: Generative AI in the workplace: how job demands and resources influence employee innovative performance – a JD-R theory perspective

Key Points

To correct errors found in the previously published research on generative AI and employee performance.
Correction of Mean value for age in Table 4
Clarification of unintended Chinese characters in Figure 2
Mean value for age corrected from 'mean' to 2.612 in Table 4.
Chinese characters removed for clarity in Figure 2.

Abstract

Li, Z., Sun, H., Yang, T., and Zeng, K. (2026),“Generative AI in the workplace: how job demands and resources influence employee innovative performance – a JD-R theory perspective”, European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print.https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-11-2025-1496Following the publication of the above article, the authors have identified errors in the published version.Table 4 – Age (Mean value)In Table 4, within the row labelled “Age” under the “Mean” column, the cell incorrectly displays the word “mean”.The correct value should read 2.612.Figure 2 – Panel (c)In Figure 2, panel (c) contains unintended Chinese characters “图表区” in the upper left corner. These characters partially overlay the figure content, affecting its legibility.The authors apologise for any inconvenience caused.

KI fragen

Bookmark

KI fragen

Bookmark

Corrigendum: Generative AI in the workplace: how job demands and resources influence employee innovative performance – a JD-R theory perspective

Key Points

Abstract

Cite This Study