Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
National multicenter retrospective study analyzes treatment outcomes in AL amyloidosis, indicating superior daratumumab efficacy.
This national, multicenter, retrospective study analyzed 1070 patients with newly diagnosed systemic light-chain (AL) amyloidosis in China (2008-2025). Findings reveal increasing annual diagnoses and a marked shift in first-line therapy from proteasome inhibitor (PI)-based regimens to predominantly daratumumab-based regimens since 2024. Monthly kinetic assessments demonstrated that daratumumab-based induction produced deeper and faster hematologic responses than PI-based therapy [≥ very good hematologic partial response (HemVGPR): 80.3% vs. 70.8%, p = 0.012; median time to ≥ HemVGPR: 1.2 vs. 1.8 months, p = 0.001], with significantly superior cardiac overall response (63.1% vs. 53.3%, p = 0.030). Early mortality rates at 1, 3, and 6 months were 5.5%, 13.2%, and 16.2%, respectively, with daratumumab-based therapy identified as an independent protective factor for 6-month mortality. Median event-free survival (EFS) was 44.4 months, while median overall survival (OS) was not reached. Achievement of hematologic complete response (HemCR) conferred superior EFS and OS over HemVGPR (both p < 0.001), with minimal residual disease negativity further improving EFS in HemCR patients (p = 0.043). Concurrent hepatic and cardiac involvement defined a high-risk subgroup with poor outcomes (median EFS 12.8 months, OS 51.0 months). Multivariable analysis confirmed Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) > 2, liver involvement, and gain1q as adverse prognostic factors for EFS, whereas ≥ HemVGPR was protective. For OS, liver involvement, concomitant multiple myeloma, and ECOG PS > 2 were independent risk factors, while ≥ HemVGPR and cardiac response predicted improved survival. This study establishes a contemporary benchmark for AL amyloidosis management in China, confirming the superior real-world efficacy of daratumumab-based frontline therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: