Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analytical sociologists assess the construction of a catalogue for social mechanisms, indicating gaps in current practice.
Since its foundational manifestos, analytical sociologists have stressed the importance of building a catalogue of social mechanisms, understood as a toolbox to provide mechanistic explanations of social phenomena. Despite its centrality, the catalogue has remained largely underdeveloped. We assess and operationalize the idea of such a catalogue of mechanisms by specifying what its construction would entail given analytical sociologists’ other theoretical commitments. We then contrast this operationalization to analytical sociologists’ current practice. We argue that the catalogue project exposes a mismatch between analytical sociology’s empirical successes and how its proponents conceptualize knowledge accumulation and generalization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiménez‐Buedo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: