Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Critical-propositional analysis explores absolute determinism and its implications for the Theory of Objectivity, highlighting tensions in modal necessity.
This article presents a critical-propositional analysis of Henry Glover’s Absolute Determinism and the Nonexistence of Fundamental Randomness: The State Zero Determinism Framework (2025), published on Zenodo under DOI https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15350206, in dialogue with the Theory of Objectivity (TO). The study examines Glover’s proposal of absolute determinism, universal causality, structured infinity, collapse of probability, hidden variables, superdeterminism, and “State Zero” as an ultimate boundary where fundamental randomness cannot persist. These ideas are confronted with the modal axioms of TO, its phenomenic elements, Inducer Effects, cosmogonic theorem, and cosmological Eras. The article argues that Glover’s framework strongly dialogues with TO insofar as both reject fundamental chance and seek a necessary structure behind apparent indeterminacy. However, it also identifies a decisive tension: while State Zero Determinism formulates necessity mainly in causal and informational terms, TO requires a modal foundation prior to physical causality itself. The analysis further emphasizes that, in TO, the transcendent element is the knowledge or information produced in atomic relations, equivalent to atomic radiations. Therefore, information is not merely what an observer acquires to eliminate probability, but an ontological product of atomic relations. This analytical text received analytical support from ChatGPT. Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; Vidamor Cabannas; Denivaldo Silva; Henry Glover; State Zero Determinism; absolute determinism; fundamental randomness; universal causality; structured infinity; collapse of probability; hidden variables; superdeterminism; modal necessity; modal axioms; phenomenic elements; Inducer Effects; cosmogonic theorem; cosmological Eras; radiation-information; atomic relations; philosophy of physics; quantum foundations; cosmology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cabannas et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: