Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mixed-methods study shows structured training improves knowledge in ICU nurses, highlighting systemic implementation challenges.
AIM: To evaluate the effect of a structured training intervention on ICU nurses' knowledge-based competence in VAP prevention in a resource-limited setting and identify personal, environmental and organisational barriers to implementation. DESIGN: An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was employed, integrating a single-group quasi-experimental pre-test-post-test quantitative strand with a qualitative interview strand. Because participant responses were not linked across assessment points, findings represent group-level improvements rather than within-individual change. METHODS: ICU nurses completed pre-test (n = 57) and post-test (n = 56) assessments using an adapted eight-item VAP prevention knowledge questionnaire. A structured 3-h workshop on VAP prevention bundles, infection control and airway management was delivered between tests; the post-test occurred within 2 weeks. Group differences were analysed using an independent-samples t-test and chi-square tests. Qualitative interview data (n = 8) were analysed thematically to explain and contextualise the quantitative findings. RESULTS: (2) = 22.43, p < 0.001). Experience variables did not predict post-test scores. Qualitative findings showed that shortages of supplies/equipment, unreliable power, absent protocols, limited supervision and high workload restricted consistent implementation. These findings highlight that improvements in knowledge may not translate into consistent bedside practice without system-level support in resource-limited ICUs. CONCLUSIONS: A brief, context-specific training workshop significantly improved ICU nurses' knowledge-based competence in VAP prevention. However, systemic barriers-equipment shortages, absent protocols, limited supervision and workload pressures-constrain the translation of knowledge gains into consistent bedside practice. Sustainable improvement requires embedding education within broader quality improvement efforts. NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yakubu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: