Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates image quality and diffusion metrics in breast MRI, suggesting improved clinical feasibility.
Objectives: This study evaluates the protocol-level image quality and quantitative diffusion metrics of a clinically implemented deep-learning–reconstructed readout-segmented echo-planar imaging protocol with water-excitation spectral fat saturation (DL-rs-EPI with WEXfs) compared with conventional rs-EPI using spectral attenuated inversion recovery (SPAIR) at 3 T. Methods: Overall, 80 patients underwent breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with both conventional rs-EPI with SPAIR and DL-rs-EPI with WEXfs protocols (b-values: 0, 800, and 1200 s/mm2). ROI-based relative image-quality metrics, including signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and lesion contrast, were assessed at b = 800 and b = 1200 s/mm2; apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were calculated using multi-b-value data. Fat suppression, background diffusion signal, lesion conspicuity, and artifact severity were qualitatively evaluated. A temperature-controlled diffusion phantom (CaliberMRI) was scanned; ADC values were compared with reference values at 24 °C. Results: DL-rs-EPI with WEXfs demonstrated higher ROI-based relative SNR estimates (b800: 5.79 vs. 5.28; b1200: 5.41 vs. 4.94; p < 0.001) and CNR estimates (b800: 3.35 vs. 3.12, p = 0.024; b1200: 3.67 vs. 3.37, p = 0.001), with unchanged lesion contrast. Tumor ADC values were comparable between protocols, whereas normal fibroglandular tissue ADC values were slightly higher, and ADC contrast increased with DL-rs-EPI with WEXfs. Phantom ADC values from both protocols closely matched reference values at 24 °C, without significant differences. DL-rs-EPI with WEXfs demonstrated more homogeneous fat suppression and reduced background diffusion signal, with comparable lesion conspicuity and artifact severity. Conclusions: The combined DL-rs-EPI with WEXfs protocol demonstrated improved qualitative and relative quantitative image quality while preserving tumor ADC measurements. As a protocol-level evaluation, these composite improvements support its clinical feasibility for high-quality breast DWI without implying the isolated effect of DL reconstruction alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: