Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Assesses how perfusion interval affects myocardial injury in patients, highlighting implications for surgical approaches.
OBJECTIVES: To assess how perfusion interval relates to myocardial injury and whether this is modified by aortic cross-clamp duration in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 556 patients receiving blood-enriched modified del Nido cardioplegia. The primary exposure and outcome were longest perfusion interval and base-10 logarithm-transformed peak cardiac troponin I within 48 hours. Analyses included multivariable regression, interaction and subgroup analysis, restricted cubic splines, sensitivity analysis, and logistic regression. RESULTS: Longer perfusion intervals were initially associated with higher cardiac troponin I (regression coefficient 0.0097, 95% confidence interval 0.0035-0.0159; P = 0.002). This association disappeared after adjustment for factors including aortic cross-clamp time and number of perfusions (regression coefficient -0.0006, 95% confidence interval -0.0109-0.0097; P = 0.913). Aortic cross-clamp time remained independently associated with cardiac troponin I (regression coefficient 0.0099, 95% confidence interval 0.0013-0.0185; P = 0.024). In patients with prolonged aortic cross-clamp time, exploratory analysis suggested a non-linear increase beyond 80 min. In patients with aortic cross-clamp time of 90 min or less, perfusion interval was not clearly associated with peak cardiac troponin I. No significant associations were found with the composite of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The association between perfusion interval and myocardial injury depended on aortic cross-clamp duration. Single-dose blood-enriched modified del Nido cardioplegia appeared adequate when aortic cross-clamp time was 90 min or less. Longer intervals in prolonged procedures may matter, but the 80-minute threshold remains exploratory. These findings support a context-dependent myocardial protection strategy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: