Key result
Additional pulmonary blood flow at Glenn linked to ~9-point higher 20-year survival vs none.
Why the study?
Management of additional pulmonary blood flow (APBF) during staged palliation toward Fontan completion remains debated, and its impact on pre-Fontan pulmonary artery growth and long-term outcomes according to APBF strategy was uncertain.
Does additional pulmonary blood flow at bidirectional Glenn improve pulmonary artery growth and long-term Fontan outcomes in patients undergoing Fontan completion?
Cohort (n=205)
No
Does additional pulmonary blood flow at bidirectional Glenn improve pulmonary artery growth and long-term Fontan outcomes in patients undergoing Fontan completion?
Additional pulmonary blood flow at the time of bidirectional Glenn promotes pre-Fontan pulmonary artery growth and is associated with higher 20-year survival, though persistent mBT-shunts carry a higher risk of requiring branch PA stenting compared to antegrade flow.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Additional pulmonary blood flow was associated with higher 20-year Fontan survival; leaves open whether randomized trials should test routine use.
OBJECTIVE: Management of additional pulmonary blood (APBF) flow during staged palliation toward Fontan completion remains debated, however it may influence long-term outcomes. To assess whether APBF promotes pulmonary artery (PA) growth before Fontan completion and whether different APBF strategies correlate with distinct long-term outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective single-center study was conducted on 205 patients undergoing Fontan completion between 1989 and 2024. Of these, 98 had APBF (83 antegrade APBF, 15 persistent mBT-shunt). Long-term outcomes included survival and freedom from PA stenting. RESULTS: Pre-Fontan PA diameters were larger in patients with APBF than in those without APBF: LPA 10.70 ± 3.76 mm vs 8.80 ± 3.43 mm (p < 0.0001) and RPA 12.18 ± 3.65 mm vs 10.99 ± 3.65 mm (p = 0.032). Within the APBF group, antegrade flow was associated with larger PA diameters than persistent mBT-shunt: LPA 11.12 ± 3.70 mm vs 9.01 ± 3.51 mm (p < 0.0001) and RPA 12.56 ± 3.67 mm vs 11.12 ± 3.59 mm (p = 0.009). Overall survival was higher in patients with APBF at 20 years (97.5% [95% CI, 83.6%-99.6%] vs 88.2% [95% CI, 75.9%-94.4%], p = 0.032). Freedom from PA stenting at 10 years was 98% (95% CI, 81.7%-96.1%) in patients without APBF, 95% (95% CI, 86.3%-98.5%) in those with antegrade APBF, and 78% (95% CI, 45.9%-92.3%) in those with persistent mBT-shunts. CONCLUSIONS: APBF appears to promote PA growth without increasing pulmonary pressures, but both APBF strategies may be associated with branch PA stenosis, with different timing according to flow type.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Orioli et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Single ventricle congenital heart disease undergoing staged palliation toward Fontan completion (n=205). Additional pulmonary blood flow (APBF) at bidirectional Glenn (antegrade APBF or persistent mBT-shunt) vs. No additional pulmonary blood flow (APBF) was evaluated on 20-year overall survival (p=0.032). Additional pulmonary blood flow at bidirectional Glenn promoted larger pre-Fontan PA diameters and higher 20-year overall survival compared to no APBF (97.5% vs 88.2%, p=0.032).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: