Why the study?
Determinants of peak oxygen uptake during maximal upright exercise in mitral stenosis are poorly characterized and may differ between sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation.
Does peak oxygen uptake during exercise correlate with resting valve area or gradient in patients with mitral stenosis?
Comparison
Sinus rhythm vs atrial fibrillation
Key result
Peak oxygen uptake was higher in mitral stenosis patients with sinus rhythm compared to atrial fibrillation (21.3 vs 18.1 ml/min/kg, P<0.05), and did not correlate with mitral valve area.
Authors
Loading...
Valve area does not predict peak VO2 in mitral stenosis; leaves open the determinants of exercise capacity for prospective study.
Cross-Sectional (n=70)
Does peak oxygen uptake during exercise correlate with resting valve area or gradient in patients with mitral stenosis?
Absolute Event Rate: 21.3% vs 18.1%
p-value: p=< 0.05
In patients with mitral stenosis, maximal upright exercise tolerance does not correlate with resting mitral valve area or gradient, suggesting peripheral adaptation and chronotropic reserve are the primary compensatory mechanisms.
Cohen‐Solal et al. (1994) conducted a cross-sectional in isolated mitral stenosis (n=70). Sinus rhythm vs. Atrial fibrillation was evaluated on Peak oxygen uptake (p=< 0.05). Peak oxygen uptake was higher in mitral stenosis patients with sinus rhythm compared to atrial fibrillation (21.3 vs 18.1 ml/min/kg, P<0.05), and did not correlate with mitral valve area.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: